Essay on E. M. Forster’s Thoughts on George Orwell’s Work

E. M. Forster’s Thoughts on George Orwell’s Work

In a 1950 commentary by English novelist Edward Morgan Forster, the effects

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

of a strong, well-constructed essay on an individual can readily be seen.

The writings of George Orwell have forced Forster to delve into the depths

of his own thoughts, even going so far as to prompt him to put those

thoughts down on paper for others to evaluate. In his article, Forster

analyzes, with critical intentions, an anthology of essays by George Orwell,

collectively entitled Shooting an Elephant. He uses these pieces to discuss

what he believes are Orwell’s pejorative ideas and objectives for writing.

It doesn’t take long for Forster to begin to describe the deeper problems

with Orwell’s habits and style. Because of Orwell’s tendency to focus on

unpleasant topics, and because of his desire to share that subject matter

with the rest of the world–almost immediately–Forster declares Orwell a

nagger. The raw fact that Orwell never seemed to let up on those

disconcerting issues troubled Forster, who felt that constant narrative

delving into unpleasantness should be avoided.

Later in his essay, Forster accuses Orwell of continuously looking into the

future with the intention of “stamping upon [the] embryos” (303) of possible

change, good or bad, which could occur in a people. Through this description

of Orwell, along with Orwell’s goal to “ameliorate a world which is bound to

be unhappy” (303), Forster almost implies that Orwell attempts to play God.

Throughout his commentary, Forster rei…

…r and

corruption. Overall, Orwell knew the important components of political and

social commentary as writing, just as Forster did when he wrote Passage to

India. Yet, what sets Orwell apart was in his ability to remain candid and

honest in a world where most felt it was only right to examine

unpleasantness at selected times. His style and topic selections continue to

evoke powerful responses from his readers, the true trait of an effective

writer. He realized that the ideas and views in his essays did not have to

be palpable in order to be successful, and it seems Forster just did not

understand that.

Work Cited

Forster, E. M. “Shooting an Elephant.” in George Orwell, editor Jeffrey

Meyers, London: Routledge and Paul, 1975, pages 302-04.

You Might Also Like
x

Hi!
I'm Alejandro!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out