From research of Sahrah et al., (2011, 2013) to the inmates in prisons of class IIA Yogyakarta, stated that the factors of religiosity, self-confidence, the meaningfulness of life, emotional maturity, social support, perception of the physical condition of the environment, and the coping strategies are the factors that affect SWB inmates. It is also concluded that among the seven factors, meaningfulness of life, self-esteem, and social support are the factors that are very significant to inmates’SWB. Factors of meaningfulness of life and self-confidence are individual factors, while social support factors are contextual factors that mostly can be manipulated structurally by the prisons as the institution responsible for training during the serving time. Hence, it is needed to know how big the role of social support on the level of subjective well-being of the men and women prisoners.
From Table 1, it can be concluded that the role of the Social Support SWB level of 8.82% to the overall male and female subjects, whereas in male subjects alone amounted to 12.96%, and the female subjects only by 2.1%. However, the percentage difference in the role of social support to SWB in men and women when they are examined again can not be proven significantly. This can be seen by the gender variable in predicting SWB social support, as shown in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. In the third table, it can be seen that the role of gender and Social Support together in predicting SWB amounted to 11.6% (on a regression coefficient of .340, p <.05). However, when viewed from the respective roles, it can be concluded that the only role of Social Support significant (p<0.05) in predicting SWB, while sexexpressed not significant (p> 0.05) in predicting SWB.
Suggestion
Harsono. H.S.CI. 1995. Sistem Baru Pembinaan Narapidana. Jakarta :Jembatan.
Sahrah. A.; Lailatushifah. S.N.F.; Indiyah; Susilaningsih. KT.; Astuti. TA. 2011. “Faktor faktor yang mempengaruhi Kesejahteraan Subjektif (Subjective Well-Being) narapidana Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas IIA Yogyakarta”. Laporan Penelitian Lembaga Pemasyarakatan-Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta.