Whittier, Gayle. ‘The Lottery’ as Misogynist Parable.
” Women’s Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, Jan. 1991, p.
Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot
353-66. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.
com/login.aspx?direct=true;db=aph;AN=5808719;site=ehost-live.In Gayle Whittier literary critique “‘The Lottery’ as Misogynist Parable”.
He argues that “The Lottery” discloses a powerful misogynist parable. He also include the commonest and most widespread cultural scapegoating even as the “political” aspect of the story seems to dispel another. Whittier also includes that the story exposes American myths. For example, the fiction of idyllic small-town life towards which, in 1948, many Americans looked to recover a pre-war, even a pre-century, innocence.
The author shows a hatred towards women and thinks they reveal the fragility of the nuclear family. He think the lottery effectively divides into competing individuals whose survival needs are at odds.William, Richard H. “A Critique of the Sampling Plan Used in Shirley Jackson’s ‘The Lottery’.” Journal of Modern of Literature, vol. 7, no. 3, Sept.
1979, pp. 543-44 EBSCOhostIn Richard William literary critique “A Critique of the Sampling Plan Used in Shirley Jackson’s ‘The Lottery’.” Williams shows two table charts to display the difference between the sampling plan used in “The Lottery” and an alternative two-stage sampling plan that he created. He explains the setup of Miss Jackson’s plan and the lack of fairness. Richard also shows the different ratios in each table. In table 1, Miss Jackson’s theory appears “fair” but in reality the biggest family is more likely to be chosen for the lottery.
In table 2, Richard comes up with a better solution on how the lottery is fair. For a big family, they are more likely to be chosen, and that it is not fair. Everyone should equally be able to be selected for the lottery.
