Results Table 1

Results
Table 1. Showing Prevalence of Smoking n (%)
Sex
History of smoking

Y es

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

No

Total Male

48 (28.2)

59 (34.7)

107 (62.9)
Female

11 (0.06)

52(30.5)

63 (37.05) Total

59 (34.7)

111 (65.2)

170 (100.00)

Table 2. Showing Age at Smoking n (%)
Sex
Age at smoking
< 10
11- 15
16- 17

18- 19

20- 24

25- 29

Total Male
1 (1.70)
5 (8.47)
15 (25.4)

15 (25.4)

12 (20.3)

0 (0.00)

48 (81.4) Female
0 (0.00)
2 (3.38)
4 (6.77)

2(3.38)

3 (5.08)

0 (0.00)

11(18.6) Total
1 (1.70)
7 (11.86)
19 (32.20)

17 (28.81)

15 (25.4)

0 (0.00)

59 (100)

Table 3. Prevalence of Smoking at School Premises n (%)
Sex
Smoking at
school premises

Yes
No
Total Male

35 (59.3)
13 (22.03)
48 (76.36) Female

3 (5.08)
8 (13.55)
11 (18.6) Total

38(64.4)
21 (35.6)
59 (100.00)

Table 4. Showing Prevalence of Chewing Tabacco n (%)
Sex
Chew ing tobacco

Yes

No

Total
Male

27 (15.88)

80 (47.05)

107(62.94) Female

2 (1.17)

61(35.88)

63 (37.05) Total

29 (17.06)

141 (82.94)

170 (100.00)

Table 5. Percentage of Student Advocating Ban on Advertisement of Tabacco Products n (%)

Sex
Chewing tobacc o

Yes
No
Total Male

93 (54.7%)
14(8.2%)
107 (62.9) Female

59(34.7)
4(2.3%)
63(37.05)
Total

152(89.4%)
18 (10.5%)
170(100%)

Table 6. Percentage of Student Advocateing Ban on Smoking in Public Places n (%)

Smoking banned No Total
Res taurant

Discos, pubs, bar’s

P ublic Place 157

38

167

92.3 %

22.3 %

98.2 %

Table 7. Percentage of Student Advocating Training n (%)

Chewing tobacc o

Yes
No
Total Male

79 (46.4%)
28 (16.4%)
107 (62.9%) Female

40 (23.5%)
23 (13.5%)
63 (37.05%) Total

119 (70%)
51 (30%)
170 (100.00)

Table 8. Percentage who Felt Health Professional act as Health Role Models for Society n (%)

sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
100 (58.82%)

7 (4.1%)

107 (62.94%)
Female
56 (32.9%)
7(4.1%)
63(37.05%) Total
156(91.7%)
14 (8.23%)
170(100%)

Table 9. Percentage of Student Advocating Routine Advise to Quit Smoking to Patients n (%)

sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male

101 (59.4%)
6 (3.5%)
107 (62.9%)
Female
56 (32.9%)
7 (4.11%)
63 (37.05%) Total
157 (92.35%)
13 (7.64%)
170 (100%)

Table 10. % age of Student Wanted to Quit Smoking n (%)
sex
Smoking
Yes
No
Total Male
36 (61.01%)
12 (20.33%)

48 (81.35%) Female
11 (18.64%)
0 (0%)
11 (18.64%) Total
47 (79.66%)
12 (20.33%)
59 (100%)

Table 11. % age of Student Recieved Ever Advise to Quit
Smoking n (%)

Sex

Yes
No
Total Male

28(47.45%)
20(33.89%)
48(81.35%) Female

5(8.47%)
6(10.16%)
11(18.64%) Total

33(55.93%)
26(44.06%)
59 (100%)

Table 12. % age of Student who Believed that Smoker Health Care Professionals Less Likely to Advise Patients Smoking Cessation Practise
Sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
87 (51.1%)
20 (11.7)
107 (62.9%)
Female
58 (34.1%)
5 (2.9%)
63 (37.05%)
Total
145 (85.2%)
8 (47.05%)
170 (100%)

Table 13. % age of Student who Believed that Tobacco Consumer Health Care Professionals Less Likely to Advise Patients Tobacco Cessation
Sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
79(46.47%)
28(16.47%)
107(62.9%) Female
46(27.05%)
17(10%)
63 (37.05%) Total
125(73.52%)
45 (26.47%)
170 (100%)

Table 14. % age of Student who had Recieved Formal Training in Smooking Cessation Approaches
Sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
70 (41.17%)
37 (21.76%)
107 (62.9%)
Female
40 (23.52%)
23 (13.5%)
63 (37.05%) Total
110 (64.7%)
60 (35.29%)
170 (100%)

Table 15. % age of Student who had Recieved Formal Training in Providing Educational Material toPatients for Smooking Cessation Approaches

Sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
80(47.05%)
27(15.8%)
107 (62.9%) Female
39(22.9%)
24(14.1%)
63(37.05%)
Total
119(70%)
51(30%)
170(100%)

Table 16. % age of Student who had Heard of using Nicotine Replacement Therapies
Sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
84 (49.4%)
23(13.5%)
107 (62.9%) Female
27(15.8%)
36(21.2%)
63 (37.05%) Total
111(65.29%)
59 (34.7%)
170(100%)

Table 17. % age of Student who had Heard of using Anti depressants Therapies
Sex
Chewing tobacc o
Yes
No
Total Male
81(47.6%)
26 (15.2%)
107 (62.9%) Female
38(22.3%)
25(14.7%)
63 (37.05%) Total
119(70%)
51(30%)
170

Life time prevalence of tobacco use among 3rd and 4th year students in indira gandhi dental college campus in Jammu was 34.7 %(Table.1). Male students were more found than female students to smokecigarettes.
Out of the 34.7 % smoking student population almost 25.4% students 1st tried a cigarette at the age of 16-17 yrs and 18-19 yrs and 11% at the age of 20-24yrs.(Table.2) .
Among all smoking students 64.4 % had smoked cigarettes on school premises/property (Table.3).
Prevalence of using chewing tobacco among 3rd and 4thyr health care students was 17.06% (Table.4).

More than 80% of students of healthcare campus favoured complete ban on advertising of tobacco products (Table.5)

More than 90 % students wanted smoking to be banned in restaurants,only 22.3 % students wanted smoking to be banned in discos,bars and pubs and more than 95%wanted smoking to be banned in public places (Table.6).

70% of Dental students in IGDC believe that they should get specific training on cessation techniques (Table.7).
More than 90% of students felt that the health professionals serve as role models for their patients and public (Table.8).

92.35% students were of the opinion that health care professionals should routinely advise their patients who smoke to quit smoking (Table.9).

More than 90 %wanted to stop smoking cigarettes ; 5.29 % did not want to stop smoking among the 34.7 % smoker students(Table.10).

Among the 34.7% smoking student population more than 55.94% had received help or advice to stop smoking cigarettes and 44.06% had not (Table.11).

Majority more than 70% of students believed that health professionals who smoke or use other tobacco products (chewing tobacco) are less likely to advice patients to stop smoking.(Table.12 ;13).

More than 60% had received during college training formal training in smoking cessation approaches to usewith patients (Table.14).

More than 70% had during their college training learned the importance to provide educational materials to support smoking cessation to patients who wanted to quit smoking (Table.15).

More than 65% students had heard of using nicotine replacement therapies in tobacco cessation programs (Table.16) and 70% of students had heard of using antidepressants in tobacco cessation programs
(Table.17).

You Might Also Like